I've been commenting on Washington Post articles. (December 2011)

He Knows History? "...there was no Palestine as a state. It was part of the Ottoman Empire..."
How come he failed to mention that Israel was ALSO part of the Ottoman Empire. Also the Byzantine Empire, the Roman Empire, the Seleucid Empire, the Persian Empire, et cetera. Now, of course, it's part of the Empire of the United States.
Not the nicest part, let me add.

12/11/2011 6:30 AM GMT+0700

on Re: The GOP’s death wish

1 Reply ▼
 

“The people of that state are going to vote out of office the people that don’t do a good job,” (Romney) said at a speech in May.
Yesss, well, we seem to have scant evidence for that assertion!
Or, is he claiming that the people of the state(s) have voted people into congress, and their legislatures, lawmakers who've done a GOOD job?
Perhaps he's not very perceptive.

12/26/2011 1:51 AM GMT+0700

on Re: For GOP, ‘repeal and replace’ has been nothing but a mantra on health-care law
 

I've been commenting on Washington Post articles. (November 2011)

I really don't think it was the gov't that "put gps in our cell phones"..., alance.
It was more a matter of marketing yet-another-marvellous-function by adding a two dollar chip to the mass that was already accumulating in your mobile device. Certainly, it's proven to be a hugely popular thing for many people, who must not have been able to find their way from home to work to market before this technology.
I'm clinging to my old 1.5G device with all the determination of an NRA member holding fast to his AK-47. When it expires, donno what i'll do. I don't want the gov't to follow me; also don't want google/apple/facebook et cet, ad nauseum, to track me!

11/14/2011 1:03 AM GMT+0700

 on Re: Supreme Court’s GPS case asks: How much privacy do we expect?
 

Years ago (in 2003, actually) I claimed it was a GOOD THING that GW Bush was going to attack Iraq that year. That way, there was going to be no way he could disguise the fact that the attack/occupation was a success long enough to fool people at election time 2004. Well, I was wrong as could be, wasn't I?
Now the shoe's on the other foot. I wonder how the current president is going to hide the fact that Iraq is circling the drain of factional violence, civil war, and dismemberment of what was supposed to be a functioning government.
What's worse, in an attempt to justify the billions of dollars spent building the Green Zone (aka White Elephant), it's entirely possible that the US will sacrifice a lot of American lives trying to occupy that little corner of Bagdhad. Before abandoning it aboard helicopters, just like in Saigon at the end of the last hugely foolish war of conquest.

11/16/2011 6:46 AM GMT+0700

on Re: On Iraq pullout, Panetta faces skeptical lawmakers
 

Actually, Mr. Gingrich is a most immoderate man. However, since his (immoderately) cherished desire is to have his own way, his immoderation takes a somewhat bizarre look on occasion.
He also has an amusing tendency to take credit for things he bitterly opposed when they happened (like the then-presidents tax and budget plans, in 1993). When Pres. Clinton's economic plan turned out to be successful, Mr. Spkr. Gingrich stepped up to *ahem* take credit for it!

11/17/2011 6:22 AM GMT+0700

on Re: Why Newt Gingrich won’t last
 

Surprise! Iran wants a bomb. Considering how often the US has had to defend itself from malign foreign states, by attacking and destroying them, any government wishing to protect itself from similar fate would want the same. It's notable that, while the US deplores WMD, it attacks only countries that DO NOT HAVE THEM. Countries with seriously damaging explosive response capability are noticeably not targets of US attacks. Thus, it behooves all other countries to build such a bomb. For defense certainly; also, of course, for the ego-pumping status of having such a device. I really find it difficult to believe that Iran would want to precipitate its own destruction by using a single, or a few, pathetic little nuclear bombs. The US is, as history shows, the only country that has ever used one as a weapon of war.

11/18/2011 1:07 AM GMT+0700

on Re: GOP’s loose lips sinking their covert options

1 Reply ▼
 

"...mainstream, centrist deficit hawks..." ?
Clearly, the mainstream has been subjected to a major riparian shift!

11/18/2011 1:14 AM GMT+0700

on Re: How we can succeed through supercommittee’s ‘failure’

  

They aren't, they just think you are.
And there appears to be some reason they believe the ornery electorate is as dumb as a post - the votes are in!

11/19/2011 1:58 AM GMT+0700

in reply to this comment

I really do not believe that, at this time in our history, we need to elect an Amphibian-American to be our president.
Though, as one of the quotees pointed out, Newt is indeed the "most interesting" to listen to.
Car crashes are a lot of fun too - and there really isn't a lot of difference between the two.

11/20/2011 3:23 AM GMT+0700

on Re: Iowa activists reevaluating Gingrich’s candidacy

1 Reply ▼
 

I really have my doubts about this 'contagion' notion. I think the various countries in the zone have been busy erecting bulwarks against such a thing. It'll be pretty messy, certainly. Sort of like what happened to Jugoslavia when the political 'leaders' started thumping the jingoistic drums of ethnic purity. The tiny, scarcely viable, countries that resulted have managed to achieve a sort of stablility. Prosperity, no, but day-to-day operability, yes.
Remember after WW II, when France and Italy made a national sport of changing governments, sometimes monthly, sometimes even faster!
It'll be like that again, I suspect.

11/20/2011 3:32 AM GMT+0700

on Re: Why E.U. collapse is more likely than the fall of the euro

3 Replies ▼
 

"Hands Off My Medicare!"
If Medicare is good enough for you, how come it's not good enough for your children/grandkids?

11/21/2011 12:48 AM GMT+0700

on Re: In 2012, both Obama and Romney would bear the burdens of health-care reform - The Washington Post
 

"...Its overindulgence was never a big problem..."
HaH?
You might wanna ask the people at the top of the Gulf of California. They're the ones who get Imperial Cty. sewer water instead of Colorado River water.
If they get any water at all, that is.

11/21/2011 5:25 AM GMT+0700

on Re: Courts put landmark California water pact in limbo, sending ripples throughout the West
 

Problem with Rick Santorum (aside from the fact that even his homestate voters detest him) is that he looks and sounds like Alfred E. Neuman.
We don't need a What-Me-Worry President any more than we need an Amphibian-American President.

11/23/2011 7:23 AM GMT+0700

on Re: Tonight’s GOP debate: Who makes the next mistake?

1 Reply ▼
 

I bought a hoodie @ Sears (& Roebuck (remember him?)). $10.
But I waited 'til Saturday. The store was well nigh empty. Except for some tired looking salesclerks. ODD: I don't remember the last time I even saw a salesperson on the floor at Sears (& Roebuck).

11/29/2011 7:00 AM GMT+0700

on Re: Austerity meets profligacy
 

Three Things...

I do not understand:
a. Why money bet in the Stock Market, and money bet in Casinos, are taxed at different rates;
b. Why cutting taxes increases revenues, in the United States, but not elsewhere and,
c. Why "deficits don't matter" if the President is a Republican, but they are unsustainable if the President is a Democrat.
No wonder Economics is known as "The Dismal Science".

Oh, Good,

... I Thought We Might Be In Trouble ...
This Bipartisan Deal (Hah!) to increase the debt limit is quite illustrative of how politics works these days in the sad, sad capital of the formerly great nation of the United States.
Remember when Ross Perot was running for President?
A century or so ago?
He had this charming notion that legislation should be submitted to the ordinary voter - read out loud on teevee, to be submitted to a popular vote.
Ignoring that for the scheme to work, the bill would have to be:
a. Comprehensible
b. Understanable
c. Reasonable
d. Present a logical choice (e.g.: raise the debt - do not raise the debt)
Legislation in todays Congress (and in state Legislatures generally) fits none of the above criteria/
This bill in particular looks a bit like one of those great football plays. You know: "Tackle-Eligible-Three-Wide-Right-Fumblerooski-Flea-Flicker-Double-Reverse-Fullback-Option-To-The-Quarterback". Amazing!
Usually resulting in a safety.
The obvious thing about this POS is that, no matter if you vote for it or not, by the time the elections come around, your fingerprints will be nowhere to be found on the corpse. It's all about automatic triggers; arbitrary targets; "bipartisan" commissions; slash & burn cuts. The congressional budgetary authority has been turned over to a player-to-be-named-later.
Precisely why our solons can vote for it.

That's Odd;

Gone From NPR, Williams Begins Bigger Role On Fox

... I thought Juan Williams was a Muslim.

("When I get on a plane," he said, "I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.") Juan Williams, on Fox News



I mean, look at that complexion. Look at the little moustache. Look at the Arab-Doing-Business-With-The-West suit. Juan looks to me like he'd be a lot more comfortable wearing a Galabeeya.
Or, considering his name (Juan?); maybe he's one of those furriners who's been sneaking across the border to steal jobs from honest hard-working Americans. I wonder: has he ever been carded by an Arizona cop?
OK; I guess that's enough stereotypes from me for today. Sorry - I guess I've been watching too much Faux News.

History Lessons

A while back, I took a trip; spent a few days in Georgetown. No, not the one in DC. The Georgetown in Malaysia, at the North end of the Malacca Straits.

It's a pretty ramshackle place - a leftover from the colonial days of the British Empire, set there to protect the shipping in the straits. Named, I presume after The Mad King George. Not much to see, and seems like everybody smokes incessantly, so eating is a bit of a challenge. Probably the most interesting place was Fort Cornwallis (1786). Yes, named after that Cornwallis. Awarded a fort, I guess, for coming in second at the Battle of Yorktown (1781). It occurred to me later that the General would probably never have been so famous if he had won the battle. Enduring fame would have come to a later commander, the one who finally lost the last major battle of the Revolutionary War. In the course of that war the British Army won most of the battles but, as predicted early by Sir Edmumd Burke, they could have won every battle and still lost the war. You cannot win a war if the other side won't stop fighting. Unless, as I've probably mentioned a few times before, you simply exterminate them (Carthagos Est Delenda).
What a terrible shame, isn't it, that Tony (The Poodle) Blair couldn't convince our own Mad King George (The Blunt Instrument) Bush? He was so intent on invading other countries, and putting them to rights, that he couldn't be bothered to check his history books.
So Now, here we are, with two lost wars, trying to find a graceful way to exit, carrying our dead with us as we go.
In Afghanistan, the warlords have never paused except to reload. Our miniscule military force on the ground has been kept rushing from pillar to post trying to find some key leader of an essentially leaderless resistance. Our wonderfully learned West Point Generals seem unable to concieve that they're fighting warriors who never even went to college.
Meanwhile, in Iraq, the various factions, having been well paid, well armed, and well trained by the U.S. military and assorted CIA cohorts, are waiting for us to leave, at which time the Potemkin Government they've put up for show will disappear, and they'll set about deciding whose Man-on-a-White-Horse will become the new Brutal Thug Dictator, replacing Saddam Hussein.
Let me dedicate this to our very own American Mad King George: Masters of War

Of Course, There's Another Way

To deal with this: "In quotes: Koran-burning threat". The good pastor Terry Jones (another Reverend Jones; Oh My!), if he would reflect for a moment on the violence, the destruction, and the out and out atrocities committed by those who have professed Christianity over the last millenium or so, might wish to toss a few Holy Bibles on his bonfire, as well.
Though, truthfully (as if that has anything to do with human motivation), every kind of person of every kind of social or religious background, is sometimes given to mindless acts of violence.
Of course, it can be fun to do something that you know will provoke the ersatz outrage of those who make a profession of being outraged. Like the staffers at Fox News, in the case of those who claim to be more-Christian-than-thou. Or, of course, the ADL cadre, who troll through the news seeking any taint of anti-semitism. And then, as here, with this little piss-ant church from Florida, there are those who like to get an expression of outrage from the Muslim guardians of righteousness. As the faux outrage spirals ever higher, so to does the pay scale of the demonstrative savers of their respective societies.
I do like some of the very predictable quotes gathered in the above very modest compendium of BBC News.

Who Authorized This?

Or, How did the CIA end up such a power unto itself? How does it get to wage war, complete with war crimes, with no adult supervision? Why does nobody ever ask questions like this? Is J. Edgar Hoover still alive (or something resembling life), and working across the street from the FBI?
Report: Blackwater Created Shell Companies. Lost in the report (well, almost lost): "Last year, Panetta [CIA Director - ed.] canceled a contract with Xe that allowed the company's operatives to load missiles on Predator drones in Pakistan, and shifted the work to government personnel ." My question: Just what the hell is the CIA doing loading missiles on RPVs?. Apparently, having sowed land mines over large swathes of Southeast Asia, pretty much destroying Laos and Cambodia, where people are routinely blown up still today, the ever-vigilant CIA is working hard to create yet another toxic dump in a foreign (read, not-like-us) part of the world. Isn't this sort of activity supposed to be the purview of the military?
Oh, well; I don't suppose the dead really care much whose finger pushed the button.
It's just that I take great offense that such crimes are perpetrated in my name.
It's madness! It's madness!

If I Were Glenn

I'd be leery of setting myself up to be compared to Dr. King. The lachrymose, saccharine, Glenn Beck is just not a very dynamic figure, except, of course to the persistently and insistently uninformed sort who "Just Sorta Know" when something's not right. I refer, of course to Sarah Palin, the leader of the Know-Nothing Movement, masquerading as the Tea Party patriots, or some variant thereof. I do confess, in these uncertain times, it can be a great relief to be absolutely certain of your (and your leader's) righteousness. Still, Faux News and its stable of odd comentators seems an unlikely place to find a fair and unbiased evaluation of the day's events. Herewith, Glenn's plan for August 28: Restoring Honor, or "Beckapalooza", according to some naysaying critics.

Absurdities In The News:

... John Boehner

"Sees ongoing economic uncertainty" (In a speech to the City Club of Cleveland, Boehner said Obama needs to act immediately on several fronts to break what the Republican describes as "ongoing economic uncertainty." ) AP, August 24.
"...called on President Obama Wednesday to fire his economic team." (House Republican leader John Boehner Tuesday called on President Obama to extend the Bush tax cuts, fire his economic team, and listen to the fears and “entrenched uncertainty” that is stalling job growth on Main Street." ) Christian Science Monitor, August 24.
His reasoning for the latter? Apparently it's because the President's economic team sees an unusual level of uncertainty in the economy. In other words, either they stole Boehner's forecast, or he stole theirs!

ALSO:

PepsiCo, maker of carbonated soft drinks and oily-salty potato and corn chips, is launching a marketing campaign to convince people that they sell healthy food (PepsiCo, largely known for junk-food brands such as Doritos and Pepsi, is setting out to triple its sales of healthier products in the next decade.) AP, August 24.

ALSO:

"Vonage Mobile"is a free app that lets you make "free phone calls": (http://apps.facebook.com/vonage-talkfree/). Apparently, if you opt for this, your Smart Phone, your WiFi, and your 3G services will no longer cost you anything. Its all Free!. (But I wouldn't make book on this last claim).

I leave additional examples (of which there is no lack) as an exercise for the reader.
Enjoy!

There's Too Much

Outofdate stuff on this blog. It is, after all, six years old. My thesis, that "I Could Be Wrong" has been well demonstrated. However, I do think that some of my more {ahem} inspired Maunderings have stood the test of a short period of time. Therefore, I've gone back over the rambling discourses; if you can call them that, and reposted a few of them here: The Best Of Frank Maunder .
Take a look, if you've a mind. It's a lot easier than trying to sort through all the odds and ends on your own (unless you'd really rather do that). Enjoy!
F. Maunder, Prop.

The Cynics Among Us

..., Including me, might simply say there's really no point in spending time and money gathering current information about the earth's meteorological state, if you have no intention of using it (Dimmer view of Earth). Ultimately, it can only be used by others as ammunition to illustrate how deeply and completely you abandoned your duty to properly care for the welfare of the country. And the planet. Best to just cripple the ability for the EOS (Earth Observing Satellite) system to measure state-of-the-earth data.
Or, a more earthy person might point out that, since politically and culturally there is absolutely no will whatsoever to do anything about the devastation of the planet, You Can't Fatten a Steer By Weighing It. So why waste the effort?

More Proof

..., If any were necessary, that Society has evolved much faster than Mankind: A hundred years ago, when people used a wall-mounted phone to make a long distance call, they tended to speak louder, to overcome the dissipating effects of distance. Today, however, everybody has a Mobile Phone (Cell Phone, in the USA). Even with a SmartPbone though, people still shout when they talk at long distance. Wouldn't a truly evolved talker know that his phone was smart enough to make the needed amplification adjustment for the distance involved?
No, even the smartest of smart phones is actually not much more than a shiny can-on-a-string to its proud (but unevolved) owner.

What America Needs

Yes! According to the new Mouth of the South, Newt "No Mosque Near Ground Zero Til Churches & Synagogues in Saudi Arabia" Gingrich, what America needs is to be more like Saudi Arabia. Perhaps Mr. Gingrich would prosper in such a toxic society; at least he wouldn't have had to divorce his cancer-stricken wife while she was hospitalized, just to take a new wife. He could have had four wives all at once, instead of serially.
Something America doesn't need: an Amphibian-American President.

Mission Accomplished

Now, Years Later... After the immediately previous president, the now notoriously maladroit George W. Bush completed his own personal mission in Iraq; that is, he killed Saddam Hussein, we find a curiously inept semi-non-government in that sad country, apparently unable to accomplish even the simplest of tasks: Top Insurgents Escaped Prison Days After Iraq Took Over. Of course, an actual functioning society was never in the sight of the former president. In fact, I suspect he wouldn't recognize a functioning society if he were to actually live in one. Which he doesn't. However, feeling pestered by his Secretary of State Colin "You Broke It, You Bought It" Powell, the president embarked on a course of Nation Building.
Doesn't seem to have worked.
Turns out, Bush was a wizard at Nation Destroying, but all his horses and all his men never managed to put any of them back together again.
It's left to the new president, Barack H. Obama, to try to put Humpty back together. Thus far, eighteen months into his term, he hasn't managed it with Afghanistan, the United States, or, apparently, with Iraq. I think the current president, a seemingly intelligent man, is devoutly hoping that what we would see in a game of chess as stalemate will look enough like success to satisfy the warlike instincts of the ordinary U.S. citizen, so he can, as president Richard M. Nixon did, simply declare victory and walk away.

Nothing Could Be Easier

Than getting the government of Israel to make itself more enemies. Here, Nadav Tamir (a Consul-General for Israel in the USA) Hamas, Israel, and the Gaza flotilla: seven facts you need to know explains how Israel was defending itself from the well-known terrorists in Gaza. Unfortunately, the world at large doesn't see things exactly in the same way.
This is not at all an unusual occurrence. The state of israel seems to be almost wierdly tone deaf when it comes to the view of people who are actually sympathetic to the Palestinians. OF COURSE the "Aid Fleet" was intended to make Israel look bad. Thanks to the actions of Israel, it succeeded beyond the wildest dreams of the instigators. Haaretz, the pretty-much mouthpiece of the Israeli government, op-edded that the United States acted like a turncoat for not unconditionally supporting any- and every- thing Israel does. It's one of the hazards, of course, of being a client state of the US. Eventually, the boss will decide you're interfering in it's agenda, causing too much trouble. And it's not as if Israel wasn't warned. But, in their resolute tone-deafness, they didn't hear the warning.
Conclusion: the Israelis are a bunch of knee-jerk chumps: Pavlov would be pleased.
Conclusion 2: the terms Middle East and Peace should not appear in the same article.
Unless you're telling a joke.

The Dastards!

The Democrats in the Senate are plotting: Coburn warns against majority-vote tactic in weekly Republican address
Yes; they're planning to pass legislation with a Majority Vote. Imagine! allowing a measly majority to determine the outcome of a legislative process!
Well, it's true, in these benighted times, that we really don't want our government to function.
Actually, in this case (Health Care Reform), I blame the President.
One of the things being said against him in the campaign was that a "community organizer" was a poor reccomendation for the presidency. I disagreed. It seemed to me then, silly fool that I was, that someone whose expertise was in getting the various stakeholders in a process to meet and negotiate was exactly what a President ought to do.
Well, I am so out of date here. The President's job today is to roll over the opposition and rule autocratically.
Observe, if you will, the relative efficiencies of George W. Bush and Barack H. Obama. It's no contest. By trying to be collegial in the face of absolute opposition, the President has frittered away his mandate. Mandates are nice, but such limited things. Bush started with one, but 6 months into his presidency, he was accorded a failure. Then he "hit the Trifecta". Remember? Pretty much ruled by fiat the rest of his administration. Pretty much dismantled the federal government in the process.
All the king's horses and all the king's men are unlikely to restore it in our lifetime (well, mine. If you're very young you might eventually see a functional government).

Nice Euphemism Tom

Yes; When the United States "intervened" in 2003, apparently we didn't attack, or invade, or occupy, or Bomb The Snot Out Of Iraq. It was more like we faced them down and sent them to a 30 day rehab. Like Charlie Sheen. "Ok Iraq, we're taking you off to Betty Ford's for a nice little rest". "U.S. intervention in Iraq" . A few hundred thousand wounded/maimed/dead, and its an Intervention! For the rest, Thomas is, as usual, pretty perceptive regarding the miasma that is Iraq. But still, there are those little-mentioned elements that are so hard to sniff out, one might think there was some denial involved. Why is there such a uniform assumption that everybody loves an Election? In fact, most times most places throughout history, "Free, Democratic Elections" aren't how people select their leaders; or they've been pretty thoroughly corrupted. As for the outcome of such a process being welcomed, I have one example: USA 2000. Ok, another: USA 2008. Lots and lots of people did not consider the eventual selectee for President to be legitimate. The other rarely mentioned factoid about Iraq's elections: the various elective offices are not open to all citizens. There's a Religious Qualification for the office of President, Prime Minister, and, for all I know, Assistant to the Assistant Undersecretary of American Military Cooperation. For some offices, you gotta be Shi'te; for others, Sunni. I think there's a few slots for Kurds, also. Reservations Required.
We distorted our version of elections pretty mightily to get our Puppet Government installed. And looking at the historical record with regard to US Puppets, the next government won't hold up very long.
I personally am trying to decide which government to bet to beat the spread: Iraq or Afghanistan.

So, What's New?

I guess there really hasn't been any substantive change through the centuries: "Before he left Rome,Caesar, by proclaiming edicts and bending the will of the Senate, had set in place a program to shore up the faltering Roman economy. The problems were many and daunting. With the commencement of the war, money had grown increasingly scarce, even while prices soared. The treasury of Rome had been emptied to pay for Caesar's military campaigns. No taxes were flowing in...." A MIST OF PROPHECIES Steven Saylor, St. Martins Press, 2002, P. 55). Except, of course, that George W. Bush is certainly no Caesar, no matter how much he thinks he is. War(s) - no change. No taxes - no change. "Bending the will (hah!) of the Senate - No Change! It's all very discouraging isn't it.
Just another instance of Maunder's Corollary; "He who does remember his past is still doomed to repeat it".
Other than that, It's a pretty good mystery set in Rome, slightly-B.C.E.

Because It Works

So Well... Skelton opposes repeal of 'Don't ask, don't tell'.
Yes, as the redoubtable Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), from the Show Me State, notes, we are currently fighting not one, but two wars. For some reason, shooting, bombing, missling, killing, dying - these aren't problems. A faggot in the army - that's a problem!
Maybe Rep. Ike (yeah, I know, I'm probably confusing him with the Reverend Ike) thinks it ("Don't Ask, Don't Tell") is a suitable legacy for his tenure in office. I'd consider it an embarassment.
Myself, I wonder why anybody who's told so clearly that he (she) isn't fit to serve his country would still volunteer to do so. I am reminded here of a fellow sailor who served in a nearby office when I was in the Navy. Everybody knew he was Gay (OMiGod!). Nobody cared. He did his job. He bothered nobody. He planned on a career in the service. The Office of Naval Intelligence (aka the Elephant Trackers, on account of they never lost track of an Elephant) found him out! Sent him to the brig. Where a squad of lusty strong (and I'm assuming non-gay) U.S.Marines beat him into a coma. After a few weeks in the hospital, he was court-martialled, found guilty of whatever, and dealt a Dishonorable Discharge. Which, at that time, pretty much meant his life was over. No one would hire him, he got no GI Bill benefits. In essence, he was criminalized. One wonders who benefitted from this Inqisitorial process. The Navy lost a reliable sailor. The sailor lost a bright future. The United States was, however, saved from ... ?.

Unindicted

The Justice Department, working under the Bush Rules, did their job: Iraqis furious as Blackwater charges dismissed.
Mission Accomplished guys!
After all, we know the entire focus of the previous administration was twofold:
1. Eviscerate the federal government - render it wholly incompetent.
2. Transfer tax dollars with the greatest possible dispatch to business cronys.
On both counts, there can be little doubt. The administration of G.W.Bush was an unparalleled success!
Meanwhile, it just wouldn't do if the business cronys the attack on Iraq was intended to enrich ended up being prosecuted for their activities. It makes no sense, does it? And it's really very simple to fix any possible legal problems.
First, 'negotiate' a status-of-forces agreement with the puppet government of Iraq that gives American 'civilians' immunity. DONE.
Second, if the business buddies or their employees get caught out, make sure the US Justice Department violates the defalcator's Fifth Amendment rights during the investigation. All the evidence will become inadmissable in court. DONE.
As lower level corrupt government officials might say: "The Fix Was In"

Error Prone

Yes; People are prone to make mistakes.
I think it's time we disabuse ourselves of the idea that any system that involves human decision making will be error-free. Check this out:
Tug Grounded on Bligh Reef in Prince William Sound
Now, tugboat Pathfinder's exact and only job is to ensure the safety of oil tankers like Exxon Valdez as they transit Prince William Sound and pass by the reef. The tug is designed for the job, the crew is trained for the job, the crew is experienced and has local knowledge of the area. Indeed, since the Exxon Valdez Disaster in 1989, Bligh Reef has become perhaps the most carefully watched hazard to navigation in all of North America. Pathfinder didn't just graze the reef either; it slammed square into it.
What happened?
The Coast Guard is investigating. Well, I should hope so!
One is inclined to suspect Human Error is at the heart of this.
Consider: If a highly skilled experienced crew going about their work can screw up this badly.
How can one reasonably expect that the drones who toil in the 'Security' Lines at airports will unerringly identify the crazies who want to board a plane with a condom full of firestarter? Out of the Billion plus people who pass through the lines each year?
Isn't this just a bit of an Unrealistic Expectation?
Meanwhile, you can follow the track of the Tug Pathfinder here.

Wonderful Things (Part II)

Sometimes, ..., I find it's good to step back, and remember that the world is full of wonderful and beautiful things.
At this stressful time of year (hmm - is there any time any more that isn't stressful?), its a good idea to take a break - go check out something fun, like the Joe Louis Puppet Theatre.

Here's a video of a fight scene from the Ramakien; the Thai version of the Ramayana.
Enjoy!

From Your Mouth

To God's Ear.

"Allahu Akbar" (God is great) - Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, November 5 2009.
"Ain't God Great" (Isn't God great) - Sen. Joseph Isadore Lieberman, August 2000.
Yes, Crypto-Republican Joseph Lieberman, who shouted "Ain't God Great" when asked by Al Gore to be his VP, is going to investigate the "Domestic Terrorist" who went on a rampage at Ft. Hood, who reportedly shouted "God Is Great", a "terrorist phrase", according to the paranoia-philiac Senator from Connecticut.
Sen. Lieberman is chiefly known for having been the legislative force behind the creation of the Homeland Security Department a dysfunctional coalescence of several already individually dysfunctional federal bureaucracies.

It's All In How You

Spin It! Here's an article from the NY Times Health section that appears to say: "...people who exercise don’t necessarily lose weight"
If one actually reads the article, however, things aren't as they appear from the title/first paragraph. What it really says is that people who exercise for three months showed a weight loss of somewhere around 1 to 2 pounds per month!
So, over a two year period, this would amount to a loss af somewhere between 24 and over 50 pounds. A not inconsiderable loss after all!
When one includes the overall improvement in health plus the improevment in self image, one can hardly find any downside whatsoever.
A better headline might perhaps be "A few hours a week of jogging, swimming, raquet sports, or even pumping iron, can result in vast improvements in your life".
Of course, exercise is not nearly as good a means of weight loss as the latest "New Miracle Diet Pill", which can help you shed all those unsightly pounds, and even restore those six-pack abs that you never actually had but wish you did.
Lets be honest here: ultimately, there's really no substitute for the Best Diet Aid Ever - Wishful Thinking.

Celebrations

Sometimes, I find myself taking a too-apocalyptic view of the world. When I catch myself at this, I find it's good to step back, and remember that the world is full of wonderful and beautiful things.
Don't mistake me: the Apocalypse is on its way. But just because it's all going to end doesn't mean it's all to no purpose. Tonight, here in the Land of Smiles, there's a marvelous celebration. Unlike in more Christian places, it's a celebration of life, rather than of death. Here we celebrate Loy Krathong, instead of All Souls Day. It's much nicer, really, to float a Krathong on the river than to walk around a graveyard. At least so I think.

Here's a video I made a couple of years back, in Suan Lumpini, the park in the center of Bangkok that hasn't quite been concreted over yet.
Anyway, Enjoy!

I'm Furious Too

Once Again, it seems, the US Government has picked the wrong puppet:
"Mr Karzai is furious..."
I can't imagine why it's so difficult for the CIA to find a good-looking well-spoken popular, but also spinelessly compliant, "client" to run the government of one of our overseas possessions. Perhaps we do actually find such people, but forget to vet them for competence. (Sort of like George W. Bush hiring people for his Administration). Could it be, do you suppose, that it's just Not In The Cards for people living in other places to happily embrace the democracy the United States tries to impose on them? With a batting average of Zero, with the notable exception of territories we stole from Mexico, it seems we just don't know how to find the right Quisling to administer our rightful sun-never-sets-on-US foreign lands.

Nonsense! (As Usual)

Now About That Nobel Prize the committee just awarded to Barack Obama: There are those, of course, who insist that the President has yet to accomplish anything. They are Dead Wrong! In fact, the single greatest contribution to peace thus far in this admittedly still young century has been the changing of the guard, from the toxic and deathdealing George W. Bush. to the far more benign and peaceable Obama.
It's true that the change of administration was scheduled by law, but that doesn't alter the fact that the number one deterrent to any peaceful settlement of conflicts worldwide has been replaced. If President Obama does nothing else, he has still earned the prize. In fact, I think almost any replacement of the previous president would be deserving. With the exception, of course, of any of a number of Bush's Neocon Cronies. They remain a Clear And Present Danger (thank you Tom Clancy) to what remains of the [Constitution for the United States of America].
Please; I ask you all to keep an eye on them. Pay attention to

The Man Behind The Curtain

(Looks a bit like Dick Cheney, doesn't it?)

My Friend Mary

My friend Mary lost her job last year.

My friend Mary is about to lose her COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985) insurance coverage.

My friend Mary is too young (60) to get Medicare health coverage.

My friend Mary isn't wealthy.

My friend Mary is a three-time breast cancer survivor.

My friend Mary isn't going to get affordable health insurance in the private market.

My friend Mary, under the new, improved, "Health Care System", as written by Sen. Max "My Job Is To Get 60 Votes" Baucus (D-Mont), won't be able to get any kind of government-sponsored health coverage.

My friend Mary will, however, be able to form a "Co-Op" with a million or so fellow cancer survivors, and, using the "Magick Of The Marketplace" negotiate an affordable health care plan with, e.g., Blue Cross.

My friend Mary can hear the insurance company executives laughing.

My friend Mary, and her fellow "undesireables" aren't joining in the laughter.

My friend Mary (and I) are astonished at the timidity of the "Democrats" in the United States Senate. No Profiles In Courage in sight.

This Is Logic?

My Students Would Get An F!

Can you reconcile the following statements?

a: "Government Is Always Wrong"

b: "The Free Market Is Always Right"

c: Therefore "Private Insurers Can't Compete With A Government Plan"

With this logic firmly in place, one wonders why we are even having a debate about Health Care.

Just how did medical care get "commoditized", anyway?

Nice

Isn't it? That we have such staunch defenders of our right to select our own doctor! Unless you're poor, in which case One Will Not Be Appointed For You. We just wouldn't feel right, denying you Freedom Of Choice.
Interestingly, many of these same Defenders Of Freedom also staunchly deny people the right to select their own spouse!
One more cynical than I might suspect a taint of hypocrisy here. But not me!
After all, if the Defense Of Marriage requires us to deny marriage to at least one - perhaps several - Detested Minorities, then sobeit!
And for those who aren't up on their Holy Bible; you should be reminded that, somewhere in The Book Of Genesis, The Lord says, and I quote: "I Said Adam And Eve - Not Adam And Steve, You Morons!" I haven't found the exact spot in the bible where it says that, but many Fox News-like commentators and bible-thumping Charlatans have assured us all that that is what the Lord Sayeth. For those few retro folk who insist on the notion that there is some sort of Separation Of Church And State, I suggest you check out the Federal Register. There's even an entire office of government dedicated to defining just who does and who does not fit the definition of Church.
Oh Well. I've drifted from my original intent a bit here. The point I wished to make: Perhaps the Defenders Of Marriage For All - those who want to include Gays(Oh, My!) and Lesbians (Oh, My!) as worthy of selecting the spouse of their choice, should buy a clue from the defenders of medical choice. Buy youself a passel of politicians!

Don't Fall For It

Madam Speaker!

Nancy Pelosi

Last Night during President Obama's speech to the Congress, Congressman Joe Wilson, from South Carolina interrupted with a nicely choreographed shout of "You Lie!" Caused a ruckus. Go figure. Now the Speaker wants an apology, in public, on the floor of the House. Bad Idea, Nancy!
The Congressman's outburst was merely his First Shout in his incipient campaign for Governor of his state: a position he (and many more) believe will shortly be coming open. Thanks for the unexpected gift, Mark Sanford

Joe Wilson

It's a dead cinch that the congressman would like nothing more than a chance to
refuse to apologize;
denounce the "Ultraliberal, Big Government, Socialistic Congressional Leadership";
Resign from Congress - a "Hero" to that certain group of voters that follow the more bellicose of lead-from-the-sideline teevee and radio talking heads.

As a populist (well, faux populist) campaigner, pledged to Restore States Rights, distance the Great State Of South Carolina to it's rightful place as a leader against that oppressive Washington D.C.. What an opportunity! A chance to run against a House of Representatives that presents a whole mess of easy targets. Not a lot of Profiles-In-Courage in that bunch. Lots of go-along-to-get-along congresscreatures on both sides of the aisle. Like fish in a barrel they are. He'll be a shoo-in.
Governor Joe Wilson...
Creating yet another Balkan-like state among the crumbling sociopolitical infrastructure of the United States.

Socialized

Groceries! (Oh! My!)

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - More than 35 million Americans received food stamps in June, up 22 percent from June 2008 and a new record as the country continued to grapple with the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

The food stamp program, which helps cover the cost of groceries for one in nine Americans, has grown in step with the U.S. unemployment rate which stood at 9.4 percent in July.

The Labor Department will release August employment figures on Friday.

June was the seventh straight month in which food stamp rolls set a record. The average benefit in June was $133.12 per person.

(Reporting by Roberta Rampton and Chuck Abbott; editing by Jim Marshall)"

Brainwashed!

On September 8. Best if you keep The Children away from school. That awful pretend president Barack "Hussein" Obama will be transmitting evil liberal-socialist-nazi brainwaves into the schools, infecting all the innocent youngsters.
Obama goes back to school. Yes; along with keeping them away from the brainwashing sites, probably best to also fit them out with tinfoil hats - wellknown for blocking mindcontrol thoughts from aliens and secret-muslim-radical-fake-presidents alike!
As the ever-alert Jim Greer (chairman of the Republican Party of Florida pointed out: "The address... obligates the youngest children in our public school system to agree with our President's initiatives or be ostracized by their teachers and classmates."
WOW! How dare he!
Considering that the Redoubtable Mr. Greer is from Florida, one wonders if he was present in the school where, on Sept. 11 2001 then-President George "W." Bush was reading to The Children. Of course, nobody has ever suggested that George W. Bush had any thoughts to broadcast!
Perhaps it's a sort of Right-Handed compliment to President Obama to worry that he'll seduce all those promising innocent young potential Republican Voters into becoming eeeeuww! Liberals!
He must be a pretty persuasive guy, to be able to instruct The Children in a few minutes, when their honest hard-working family-values conservative christian parents can't even get 'em to pick up after themselves!

Critical

As I mentioned in a footnote to a previous post; It's time for President Obama to start opposing the things he formerly proposed. So that he can get the I'm Against Whatever Obama's For congresscreatures to pass the legislation he actually supports.

Now's The Time:

Obama to address Congress as health care debate grows

Time for the President to toss the "Public Option" overboard. How about proposing Privatizing Medicare? Sounds Good To Me. Get rid of that evil Socialized Medicine. Your Taxes (Your Hard-Earned Dollars) Will Go Down! Yes!
What you pay for health care will, of course, go up. Waay Up. But at least the money won't pass through the hands of those Government Bureaucrats. It'll pass into the hands of those Insurance Company Bureaucrats. Where a large part of it will stay.
It's the Capitalist Way. Let the deserving company presidents and CEOs have as much money as they can arrange to wring out of their customers.
Slightly (only slightly) more seriously: it might be a really good idea for people to step all the way back to an examination of First Principles of Society. What's appropriate in the Public Sector, and what's appropriate in the Private Sector?

Examples:
1. Public Police Department protection from criminals?
2. Public Fire Department protection from fires?
3. Public Health Department protection from disease?

Does that third department seem appropriate? Actually, there's already such a thing; tasked with seeing to the health of the population at large. Working to insure sanitary conditions and guard against epidemics. I don't hear a lot of complaining about those functions. Especially now that there's a New Flu scare. Let's get the government to make a vaccine!
There are some, of course, who consider vaccines to be a Liberal Conspiracy to infect The Children with that infectious Liberalism. Or perhaps to make them gay! Still, most people Trust (Oh My!) the Government's ability to deal with infectious diseases. So why not trust the government health system with health issues generally?
Not positive here, but I suspect it's that old paranoid Dog-In-The-Manger feeling that My money might wind up being spent on Your care.
I pay taxes for all three of the departments I listed above, not to save you from crooks, fires, illness. Those government programs (socialized police, fire, health departments!). I just don't want those plagues visited on you to spread to me!
When it comes to my own personal care, I trust that my special virtue - the same one that makes it certain I will win the lottery someday - will protect me from fire, flood, crooks, liars, cheats, thieves and, yes, cancer, stroke, heart failure, and all health problems taken together. Except for the problems I already have; for those I can take a pill. Courtesy of the new Medicare Prescription Drug (Company) Benefit.
So there's really no reason to change things is there? We're all happy the way things are now.
QED

What Does "Winning" Mean?

Last year, one of the things Candidate Obama campaigned on was the need to "win the war in Afghanistan". So: More Troops, New Commander, More Money. Also, somebody assigned to create some "Metrics" with which to measure "Progress". Come up with something like the fabled (and fabulous) "Body Counts" of Vietnam War era fame. Still, one really must decide first what it means to "Win" before one can measure "Progress", mustn't one?
A common definition of winning, or success, when talking about Iraq has been the phrase "...stable democratic government that is friendly to the USA".
Well. That's not going to happen. Democracy isn't going to exist in that part of the world today any more than it existed in fifteenth century Europe. Not to mention that Puppet Governments are never popular, not even with their Puppet Masters. As we see, the "Government Of Afghanistan" is much more a State Of Mind of old leftover Cold Warriors. So, sorry, Winning: Not In The Cards. We've already Lost The War. And yes, it's Obama's Fault. In the previous administration, the plan was to neither Win nor Lose the war. An Endless War; a Perpetual Profit Center for the Arms Suppliers. A Full Employment Plan for Soldiers OF Fortune (note: now constituting 57% of US forces in Afghanistan - New York Times, Sept. 1). A Rapid Promotion Plan for REMF's (Rear Echelon... I leave the rest to you to fill in). Yes; Keep It Simmering.
"... With contractors focused on preserving profits and filing paperwork with government auditors, he said, 'you grow the part of government that, probably, the taxpayers appreciate least.'
Congress appropriated at least $106 billion for Pentagon contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2003 through the first half of the 2008 fiscal year, the report says." (Ibid)
What's really eerie; for seven years, Nobody Complained! Now, with the new president actually considering the idea of an End To The War In Afghanistan, people are worried! I even read that some Pentagon REMF's are afraid that the new president doesn't have a Bushlike commitment to the war!
An odd sidebar: With the likes of Cold Warrior George Will advocationg an end to the war, causing one to wonder if the End Times are upon us, we see an interesting phenomenon. Perhaps the Party Of No can be manipulated by a sort of Automatic Whiplash process. Perhaps if the President now declares his opposition to something, the People United Against Everything The President Is For will advocate for it. Health Care Reform might end up being a Republican Issue, passed by 100% of Republican Congressmen, abetted by a small number of Blue Dog (read; 'Fraidy-Cat) Democrats.
President Obama can scream and yell and threaten to Veto any health care bill. Then (hiding his smirk), Reluctantly sign it. Handing out the symbolic pens to the Republican Sponsors!
Well, it's a nice scenario, isn't it? Goes along with the general fantasy world we appear to have slipped into in this century.

In 2003...

... when (about) a million marchers protested the then-President's plan to invade Iraq, the media seemed to mostly characterize the protesters as "naive", or "unrealistic".
Today, when what actually appears to be a lot less than a million protesters are showing up at "Town Hall" meetings, the media seem to conclude that this is a complete hindrance to the current-President's major initiative.
Why? What causes them to take such a different view of the disputes?
There's also some criticism of President Obama for putting forth different rationales for his Health Care Plan. This, I've read, completely discredits the entire plan. Unlike, of course, then-President Bush's continuous floating of different trial balloons as reasons he should be allowed to invade Iraq. My own favorite was the assertion that the cost of patrolling the No-Fly Zones (something like $55 million/year) was simply too much for the DoD budget to bear! At any rate, the then-President finally struck paydirt with his claim that Iraq had WMD, which got the public scared enough to believe the absolutely unsubstantiated assertion, and logrolled the Congress, not a group noted these days for their Profiles In Courage. So, Bush got his way. Ending up wasting a few trillion dollars and creating a permanently destabilized and ungovernable Iraq in place of the 55 million dollars a year and a permanently disabled but stable Iraq. To say nothing of the numberless dead.
By comparison, today's major issue, health care reform, doesn't seem important to the people who haven't had to think about their own future.
I myself am endlessly thankful for the government's Socialized Medical Care program. Without Medicare, I'd have to keep working until I finally dropped dead - or figure out some way to get filthy rich. This only to have some way of paying for medical care if something should happen.

Just Had To Show This

Sometimes a Picture Really Is Worth A 1000 Words!

"De Mortuis..."

nil nisi bonum"
But, sometimes there are exceptions. It's Official now: Michael Jackson is even more annoying dead than he was when he was alive.
Or perhaps it's the sleazy operators who look at a dead celebrity and see $$$ signs.
"By George - I think he's got it!"

No Public Option!

Apparently, according to the 'usual sources' - all of which seem to be more about promoting some particular point of view than actually reporting anything real - the President is willing to cave and discard what's become known as the " Public Option" in health care reform. My question: Does this mean that the people currently insured under the already-existing "Public Option" (aka Medicare) are going to have their insurance cancelled?
"The agency (Medicare) provides health insurance to 98 million people, pays 1.2 billion claims a year and has an annual budget of more than $700 billion. It has a pervasive influence on medical care, regulating hospitals, doctors, health plans, laboratories and almost every other type of health care provider. When Medicare decides to cover a new treatment or adopts a new payment policy, private insurers often follow its lead." ("Lack of Medicare Appointee Puzzles Congress"; New York Times, August 17, 2009).
Or will the current Medicare recipients be grandfathered, as it were? If Medicare is cancelled, what's going to happen to those niney-eight million people? Most of 'em probably can't get, or can't afford, private insurance. Heck, the private insurance companies didn't want them to begin with; that's why they let the government create Medicare in the first place. So they could charge an arm 'n a leg to insure the healthy, and then turn them over to a tax-supported system when they started to need expensive health care.
A caution: when people have to loot their childrens' education funds, hock the house, risk bankruptcy, all to provide medical care to Granny, who is now without insurance, those currently mythical Euthanasia Chambers out behind the local hospital are going to start looking like a good idea.
On the plus side: the Medicare Trust Fund won't be running out of money.
On another plus side: the George W. Bush Medicare Prescription Drug (Company) Benefit, dedicated to shelling out the greatest possible amount of tax dollars to Big Pharma, won't be giving your tax dollars away, either.
Saved From Socialized Medicine! Thank God Almighty! Also Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Fox "News", et. alia.

The Experience

"Palm Pre phone secretly used GPS to report user's location to company". (Los Angeles Times, August 13, 2009). This appears to be in support of the company's alleged "great user experience."
Yes, according to software developer Joey Hess, his mobile phone has been reporting his whereabouts to "Palm Inc."; likely a CIA shell corporation aiding in the TIA(Total Information Awareness) program. Imagine what it must feel like - being stalked by your own phone! Of course, that is probably exactly what is going on in your case as well, though perhaps your phone is reporting to a different "Company". After all, as Dick (Undisclosed Location) Cheney and Don (Remember Him) Rumsfeld would say, it's a part of the "Freedom Experience" that's the birthright of every American Citizen.
Just how we came by this annoying euphemism "User Experience", an offshoot perhaps of Bill Gates' "Compute Experience" I cannot say. But it does seem a little... umm... racy. Is a "Phone Experience" perhaps something like a "Sheep Experience", or maybe a "Donkey Experience"? Really, I'd rather use a phone than have an experience with it. Though it does look a bit as if some people are "Going Steady" with their phone. Almost to the point where it might be appropriate to suggest that they "Get A Room".
In any case, while not wanting to appear in any way speciesist, I think I'd prefer to confine my "Experience"s to friends of the Human persuasion. or at the outside, at least to the Class Mammalia

Follow The Logic

I really don't understand why some people are having trouble with the argument being put forth by the "Birthers". Here's how the argument goes. Lets begin with the -

First Premise: Barack "Hussein" Obama can't possibly be the President of the United States. That's quite clear. I mean, just look at him! He's Black! (In case you hadn't noticed) Actually, not very black, but black enough. More like Colored, maybe. Anyway, he's not at all like all the presidents we had before. (He's also intelligent, which really means he's "Uppity).

Therefore: He must not be qualified to be President.

Consider: the requirements to be President (from Article II, Section 1; Executive Power): "...No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

Thus: Barack "Hussein" Obama is NOT a "natural born citizen".

QED.

Note: I personally have No Comment with regard to the First Premise. It's noticeable that most people begin by believing what they Want To Believe, and proceed from there, in a sort of Reverse Drunkard's Walk to the necessary premise.

Footnote: A friend of mine from Britain exclaimed to me that he believed Americans to be the most ignorant people in the world. I demurred. I believe that Americans are quite ordinarily ignorant. It's just that they have so much greater scope for their ignorance. A larger canvas than others, so to speak. A bigger wall for the shit to stick to.

"Threat Reduction"!

Orwell Was Right! "War is Peace", apparently, at least to some Department of Defense (Hah!) and some Military-Industrial Complex folk. The amusingly-labelled "Threat Reduction Agency" is scoping out the possibility of making the world's biggest-ever bomb - although not the 9.5 million kg size mentioned by the semi-literate and an-metric writer and editor of this article: Pentagon eyes accelerated "bunker buster" bomb. Now there's threat-reduction for you!
Yes, George Orwell proves once again to have been a prophet of modern man.
Reminds me of a graffito I saw on a toilet wall once (in a Navy Club, unsurprisingly): "Support Mental Health Or I'll Kill You".
I do appreciate self-referential, or Orwellian, irony. Helps me keep my apocalyptic view of humanity fresh and growing.

Well Yeah!

Col. Timothy Reese seems willing to Speak Truth To Power here: Time ‘to Go Home’. How it's escaped the notice of pretty much the entire United States Government and Military for all these years is beyond belief. Finally, someone up and says "Since the signing of the 2009 Security Agreement, we are guests in Iraq, and after six years in Iraq, we now smell bad to the Iraqi nose..." Actually, I think we started to stink somewhere along about Day Three in Bagdhad. In rebuttal, a spokesman (the proverbial Spokesman, brought forward when the principal can't stand the heat), offered that: "some of the problems the memo referred to had been solved since its writing in early July"! Well; of course. After six years of heavy lifting, the problems we created during that time have been largely solved in the moments between the proverbial 11:59 and Midnight. How Fantastic Is That!
Now, in my opinion, Gen. Odierno is a moron studying to become an idiot. Still, he's obviously learned the Army's Secret Handshake - or - How To Follow Orders, quite well, so he can't be a total washout. Good soldier that he is, he's willing to take the fall and look like even more of an incompetent than he really is. He'll take the incompetence of the entire DOD on his own solid shoulders.
Considering that, dating back at least to the First Crusade, power in that part of the world has been held by leaders who successfully practice the politics of resentment, fear, and anger (pretty much the way some US administrations have been doing lately), how anyone could ever have believed that the Occupying Army of the United States would ever be welcomed to Bagdhad is far beyond credibility. Col. Reese simply says what I and perhaps a million or so others said in 2003. Perhaps he too will be labelled as "naive" for thinking that the Hegemonic Force of the Triumphalist Last-Superpower-On-Earth United States Military isn't capable of subduing every country that dares to demur. I guess some people need reminding.
On the Other Hand, there's Maunder's Lemma (see sidebar on left): Not only do men not remember their past, they don't even remember the present!

The Serial Resignee

It Seems To Have Gone Unnoticed (well, largely unnoticed): But - Alaska Gov. (now ex-) Palin (Palin faces questions as she makes her exit) also resigned her Mayorship and her position on the Alaska Oil & Gas Board. Could a pattern be emerging?
Apparently the New Plan is to "speak out" on important issues. Or, as Mrs. Palin Tweets: "Ain't gonna shut my mouth / I know there's got to be a few hundred million more like me / just trying to keep it free..." Sense Free, I'd guess. Count me not among those who are like Sarah Palin.
I don't know about the voters of the United States or Alaska in general, but I personally feel a bit disinclined to give much credence, or my vote, to someone whose thought process extends no deeper than 140 characters. Still, in these short-attention-span-times, perhaps a Tweet is about as much data as the ornery citizen can handle.

Those Republicans!

They certainly appear to be a randy bunch, don't they? The Senator (Ensign), and now the Governor (Sanford). And don't forget former moralists Larry Craig and Newt Gingrich. Add in a handful of Born-Again Charismatic Charlatans from the TeeVee Ministries, and it adds up to quite a stud farm. Maybe that's why there was such outrage against Bill Clinton. A lot of the opposition party felt he had strayedonto their turf.
In any event, with the Presidential Hopefuls from the Republican Party rushing, Lemminglike, over the cliff, it now seems that Sarah Palin will be a shoo-in for the 2012 Republican Presidential Nomination. She, at least, is a whole generation removed from extra-marital sexual escapades, having left that sort of thing to her daughter Bristol.

Bottom Line: The Democrats have more power, but the Republicans have more fun!

What Are They Thinking?

...Or perhaps What Are They Smoking? It says Here, in The Washington Post: "In recent days, GOP leaders have invoked the unambiguous Cold War rhetoric of Ronald Reagan as the model for the message Obama should be sending to the demonstrators..." My God! Where did these guys go to school? California? I'd really be interested if Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham are referring to when Ronald Reagan sent undercover agents to Tehran to bribe the Ayatollahs with weapons to attack Iraq; or are they talking about when Reagan sold Nerve Gas to Saddam Hussein to use against Iran (and also his own Iraqi Kurds)?
The record of Ronald Reagan is actually pretty clear. Whenever the United States was actually attacked, he retreated and negotiated. All the while talking big. Iran? He bribed 'em. Lebanon? He pulled the troops out.
On the other hand, he won Big Time in Grenada.
So I guess he wasn't a Total Wimp.

On The Defense Of Marriage

In The "Good Old Days" (which probably weren't really all that good), most people thought the best way to Defend Marriage was to forbid Divorce. Force people who didn't want to stay together to stay together. (Note: the Catholic Church, only now emerging from the 17th Century, still espouses this concept).
Today, most people think the best way to Defend Marriage is to forbid ermm... Marriage! Force people who do want to stay together to remain apart.
I have a Third Way: Don't let people who are going to get divorced get married! How simple is that? Only allow marriage to those who will stay married.
Hey, it could work! What's certain is that neither of the two strategies I mentioned above is worth that classic Bucket Of Warm Spit. They have been time-tested and found worthless.
Full Disclosure here: I really do not understand the fierce drive many people have to Get Married. At Any Cost.
Equally, I even more really do not understand the fierce drive some people have to decide who can and can't get married.
It's all a big riddle to me.
So, perhaps I shouldn't even be bloggerizing about it.