I personally have some questions to ask. First, and very topically, I read almost daily that we are facing a major massacre, potentially in the hundred-million-plus range, should the H5N1 strain of Avian Flu infect a human-flu carrier and mutate(!) into a human-transmittable bug. Apparently, those shameless viruses (virii?) will swap DNA with anything that moves - absolutely the ultimate in sexual deviancy - no wonder the Godly Set wants such knowledge suppressed!
At last, The Question: Would these good Kansas folk consider this to be an example of ID, or, would they prefer to let Darwin take credit for this particular instance of life-as-it-actually-is?
Yesterday I was chatting with a colleague and the subject meandered onto the topic of inherited (that is, genetic) diseases - the most commonly mentioned being Sickle-Cell Anemia. It's an interesting example of adaptation. It's most prevalent in malarial areas of Africa where, interestingly enough, carriers of the Sickle-Cell gene (allele S) have an immunity to Malaria. If they carry the S allele in one chromosome only, they will generally suvive Malaria, while the Sickle-Cell trait will be largely innocuous. If they carry the S allele in both chromosomes they will (probably) eventually die from the progressive blocking of capillaries by their overly viscous blood. Generally, they will die very protracted and very painful deaths.
Thus, as a professor of mine once described it to me; in the worst malarial areas of Aftica, most adults are heterozygous carriers of the S allele. Because, in the normal course of events, just as shown by Gregor Mendel with Sweet Peas, about 1/4 of the children in these areas die from Malaria, about 1/4 of the children die from Sickle-Cell, and the other 1/2 of the children survive.
Sounds like a pretty intelligent design to me!
My colleague, however, said he didn't think it was very intelligent to kill half of the children just to accord the survivors some protection against Malaria.

No comments:
Post a Comment